Monday, April 20, 2009

In the constituting of an Abbess let this plan always be followed, that the office be conferred on the one who is chosen either by the whole community unanimously in the fear of God
or else by a part of the community, however small, if its counsel is more wholesome. Merit of life and wisdom of doctrine should determine the choice of the one to be constituted, even if she be the last of the order of the community. But if (which God forbid) the whole community should agree to choose a person who will acquiesce in their vices, and if those vices somehow become known to the Bishop to whose diocese the place belongs, or to the Abbots, Abbesses or the faithful of the vicinity, let them prevent the success of this conspiracy of the wicked, and set a worthy steward over the house of God. They may be sure that they will receive a good reward for this action if they do it with a pure intention and out of zeal for God; as, on the contrary, they will sin if they fail to do it.


Based on legendary tales, history, and our contemporary observation of more primitive tribes, democracy may be the most common approach to choosing leaders.

But it is also common for leaders to beget leaders, through dynastic ambition or personal favor. We can seek immortality through our genes or our memes.

After the ascension of Jesus the apostles cast lots in choosing Matthias to replace Judas. Bishops were elected by the people of a single city. Generations were required before a self-perpetuating hierarchy emerged.

Before casting lots it is written that the eleven prayed, "Lord you know everyones heart. Show us which one of these two you have chosen to take the place in this ministry and apostleship..." (Acts 1:24-25)

Each elector is encouraged not to vote self-interest, but to advance our best understanding of God's will and kingdom.

No comments:

Post a Comment